Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n NO. and wtf?\r\n
|
4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck?
|
||
|
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n NO. and wtf?\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n it is ture\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n 22r...enough said\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n number of cylinders doesnt matter\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n no thats not true, 2002+ ford ranger 2.3 is better in my opinion than the v6 f150 and the 3.0 rangers
\n \n \ndepends how you use it though\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n diesel\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n i have a 95 ranger with the 2.3L, 4 cylinder. i beat on it the the last 8 years, and its almost at 200,000. only thing i had to replace was a belt, couple hoses, and a clutch ( clutch at 168,000 ).\r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n
\r\n 2.3 ranger FTW!!!!Quote: \r\n
\n \r\n 98 ranger 2.3L 4 cylinder, 178k miles, only replaced a timing belt (another awesome part of this motor, non interferance motor!!!) and the standard maintence... hauled 2 bikes, gear, luggage, and 6 spare tires on a 750 miles round trip averaging 27mpg at an average speed of 75!!!!\r\n
Quote: \r\n
Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n just drove my 1998 4cyl s10 back and fourth to maine and mass for a total of around 900 miles around 30mpg from what I gather and its still runnin great at 126k miles\r\n
| ||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|