Stuntride
4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - Printable Version

+- Stuntride (https://stuntride.the-nags.com)
+-- Forum: General Category (https://stuntride.the-nags.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: Automotive (https://stuntride.the-nags.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=53)
+--- Thread: 4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? (/showthread.php?tid=22675)

Pages: 1 2 3


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - SquidBait808 - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n NO. and wtf?\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - coonRAD - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n it is ture\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - GIL with 1 L - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n 22r...enough said\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - waylandplayer - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n number of cylinders doesnt matter\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - waylandplayer - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n
\r\n
Quote:
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n Originally Posted by coonRAD\r\n View Post\r\n
\r\n
it is ture
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
most trucks with 4 cylinders are smaller and it depends how you use the truck.\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - josh02f4i - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n no thats not true, 2002+ ford ranger 2.3 is better in my opinion than the v6 f150 and the 3.0 rangers
\n
\n
\ndepends how you use it though\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - Raf - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n diesel\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - BC_ - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n
\r\n
Quote:
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n Originally Posted by josh02f4i\r\n View Post\r\n
\r\n
no thats not true, 2002+ ford ranger 2.3 is better in my opinion than the v6 f150 and the 3.0 rangers
\n
\n
\ndepends how you use it though
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
i have a 95 ranger with the 2.3L, 4 cylinder. i beat on it the the last 8 years, and its almost at 200,000. only thing i had to replace was a belt, couple hoses, and a clutch ( clutch at 168,000 ).\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - StuntBikeJake - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n
\r\n
Quote:
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n Originally Posted by josh02f4i\r\n View Post\r\n
\r\n
no thats not true, 2002+ ford ranger 2.3 is better in my opinion than the v6 f150 and the 3.0 rangers
\n
\n
\ndepends how you use it though
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
2.3 ranger FTW!!!!
\n
\r\n
Quote:
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n Originally Posted by BC_\r\n View Post\r\n
\r\n
i have a 95 ranger with the 2.3L, 4 cylinder. i beat on it the the last 8 years, and its almost at 200,000. only thing i had to replace was a belt, couple hoses, and a clutch ( clutch at 168,000 ).
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
98 ranger 2.3L 4 cylinder, 178k miles, only replaced a timing belt (another awesome part of this motor, non interferance motor!!!) and the standard maintence... hauled 2 bikes, gear, luggage, and 6 spare tires on a 750 miles round trip averaging 27mpg at an average speed of 75!!!!\r\n


4 cyl vs 6 cyl pick up truck? - *trix* - 08-13-2026

\r\n \r\n just drove my 1998 4cyl s10 back and fourth to maine and mass for a total of around 900 miles around 30mpg from what I gather and its still runnin great at 126k miles\r\n