Less than 1 minute ago
\r\n \r\n
\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
2.3 ranger FTW!!!!Quote:
\r\n | \r\n \r\n \r\n Originally Posted by josh02f4i\r\n \r\n  \r\n no thats not true, 2002+ ford ranger 2.3 is better in my opinion than the v6 f150 and the 3.0 rangers \r\n \r\n \n \n \ndepends how you use it though | \r\n
\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
98 ranger 2.3L 4 cylinder, 178k miles, only replaced a timing belt (another awesome part of this motor, non interferance motor!!!) and the standard maintence... hauled 2 bikes, gear, luggage, and 6 spare tires on a 750 miles round trip averaging 27mpg at an average speed of 75!!!!\r\n
Quote:
\r\n | \r\n \r\n \r\n Originally Posted by BC_\r\n \r\n \r\n i have a 95 ranger with the 2.3L, 4 cylinder. i beat on it the the last 8 years, and its almost at 200,000. only thing i had to replace was a belt, couple hoses, and a clutch ( clutch at 168,000 ). \r\n \r\n | \r\n