2013 636

[Stubbz63]

or so is right lol, stock 600s have about 105, 636 must be 112+

[lee majors]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stubbz63 or so is right lol, stock 600s have about 105, 636 must be 112+

think it might be more like 105 for the dirty

[Juca]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee majors think it might be more like 105 for the dirty

120

[lee majors]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juca 120

is that what the spec sheet says, cuz they're never right jure

[lee majors]

i'll give it 106 stock. someone on another site had it dyno'd with a jardine slip on and a k&n filter as the only mods and said it topped at 111

[navajowalks]

15 extra horses is a lot on a 450lb machine lol...

[Juca]

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee majors is that what the spec sheet says, cuz they're never right jure

buddy said that when i asked... btw f2 had around 110 in spec sheet?

[BNasty]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix Josh Awesome! I wonder what made them decide to bring it back? I can't seem to click on the little article to make it bigger to read what it says, unless you can't?

http://blog.motorcycle.com/2012/08/1...-displacement/

[~03~raven]

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickLAudio is that plastic going all up the forks? if so, yea that is weird

Yea like they've been doing on the Z-1000s. Can easily be removed.

[COOLIE]

It's a 2012 with a 636 motor lol